Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Teimuraz Gabashvili vs Mika Brunold Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gabashvili vs Brunold analysis and find out who is favored!
Teimuraz Gabashvili vs Mika Brunold Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Gabashvili 0 - 0 Brunold
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gabashvili has won 46.41% of points on his second serve, while Brunold has won 48.69%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gabashvili, in recent form, has won 52.15% of his opponent's second serve points, while Brunold has won 54.7%. The same stats for first serve returns are 44.27% and 36.16% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gabashvili has saved 48% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Brunold has saved 59.78% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gabashvili has won 72.97% of matches played (W/L 27/ 10), with Brunold winning 52% (W/L 26/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gabashvili has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 291/ 242), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 39% (W/L 12/ 19). Brunold has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 24/ 19), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 44% (W/L 7/ 9).
- Player level: In the last year, Gabashvili has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 72.97% of matches (W/L 27/ 10), where as Brunold has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 55.81% of matches (W/L 24/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gabashvili has played against opponents with an average rank of 41.84 while Brunold has played against players with an average rank of 173.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gabashvili has won 80% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Brunold has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gabashvili has converted 42.31% of breakpoint opportunities, and Brunold has converted 47.09% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
881
Rank
43
High
38
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
642
Rank
549
High
19
Age
Plays
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
53% (662-592)
Career Total W/L
54% (51-44)
80% (8-2)
YTD W/L
59% (13-9)
$1,636,260
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Gabashvili VS Brunold H2h Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Teimuraz Gabashvili | Mika Brunold |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 80% (8/2) | 59% (13/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 70% (16/7) | 56% (28/22) |
| Games Win/Loss | 60% (129/87) | 52% (249/229) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 43% (3/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 80% (8/2) | 73% (8/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.21 | 0.21 |
| Aces Total | 22 | 49 |
| DFs per game | 0.42 | 0.31 |
| DFs Total | 45 | 72 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:19:30 | 1:57:2 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 110.27 |
| 1st Serve % | 53% (263/500) | 61% (961/1586) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (181/263) | 65% (624/961) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (110/237) | 49% (304/625) |
| BPs Won% Total | 42% (33/78) | 47% (80/169) |
| Return Pts W% | 47% (252/532) | 43% (677/1571) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 80% (8/2) | 62% (13/8) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 80% (8/10) | 57% (12/21) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 50% (4/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (3/3) | 57% (4/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (6/6) | 82% (11/9) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (6/0) | 18% (11/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 50% (4/2) | 36% (11/4) |
Teimuraz Gabashvili Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Maxim Mrva
Player
Teimuraz Gabashvili
46%
(
29 of
63)
1st Serve %
58%
(
39 of
67)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
7
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
43%
(
27 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Teimuraz Gabashvili
Player
Markus Molder
50%
(
34 of
68)
1st Serve %
50%
(
35 of
70)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
73
Total Points Won
65
|
4-6 6-2 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Teimuraz Gabashvili
Player
Matteo Meneghetti
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
70%
(
46 of
66)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
27%
(
7 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
51%
(
29 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
42 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Marlon Vankan
Player
Teimuraz Gabashvili
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
50%
(
27 of
54)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
20 of
27)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
22 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Teimuraz Gabashvili
Player
Kanan Gasimov
53%
(
28 of
53)
1st Serve %
70%
(
49 of
70)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Teimuraz Gabashvili
Player
Luca Wiedenmann
52%
(
45 of
86)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
93)
9
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
1
82%
(
37 of
45)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
39 of
60)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
31 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
93)
94
Total Points Won
85
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Teimuraz Gabashvili
Player
Zekai Li
56%
(
40 of
71)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
77)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
42%
(
30 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
77
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 4-6 10-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Teimuraz Gabashvili
Player
Vishal Saravanan
43%
(
19 of
44)
1st Serve %
76%
(
25 of
33)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
2
74%
(
14 of
19)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
52
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Mika Brunold Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Mika Brunold
Player
Marlon Vankan
56%
(
49 of
88)
1st Serve %
69%
(
75 of
108)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
43 of
75)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
34 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
52 of
108)
106
Total Points Won
90
|
5-7 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Mika Brunold
Player
John Sperle
58%
(
45 of
78)
1st Serve %
54%
(
44 of
81)
4
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
42%
(
33 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
41 of
81)
86
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mika Brunold
Player
Koray Kirci
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve %
68%
(
42 of
62)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
16 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
56
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 1-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mika Brunold
Player
Jakub Filip
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
57%
(
37 of
65)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mika Brunold
Player
Daniil Sarksian
63%
(
60 of
95)
1st Serve %
46%
(
31 of
67)
0
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
9
50%
(
30 of
60)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
46%
(
44 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
86
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Filip Cristian Jianu
Player
Mika Brunold
78%
(
64 of
82)
1st Serve %
75%
(
63 of
84)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
56%
(
36 of
64)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
45%
(
37 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
47 of
84)
92
Total Points Won
74
|
6-1 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mika Brunold
Player
Darius Florin Pop
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve %
49%
(
34 of
69)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
79
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mika Brunold
Player
Fadi Bidan
54%
(
50 of
93)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
80)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
44%
(
19 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
44%
(
41 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
44 of
80)
96
Total Points Won
77
|
5-7 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mert Naci Turker
Player
Mika Brunold
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
9
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mika Brunold
Player
Oleg Prihodko
51%
(
23 of
45)
1st Serve %
51%
(
27 of
53)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Gabashvili Vs Brunold Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
